|
Flotilla 45:
Safeguarding Navy Unmanned Underwater Vehicles
by
Phillip Ransford FSO-OP
On June 3,
2005, Mike Dunn, FC, 130-04-05, of Bremerton, WA, received a
heads-up from a contact at Naval Undersea Warfare Center,
Keyport, WA, that they were requesting Auxiliary support for a
range safety patrol on June 6-16. NUWC was hosting an
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Festival (AUVFEST) in-water
demonstration event during that time and would have numerous
submersible and surface vehicles underway in several operations
areas within their normal Restricted Area, as well as deploying
divers. NUWC resources were otherwise engaged and unable to
provide the desired safety patrols needed to safeguard both
Naval resources and the boating public. Flotilla 45 immediately
started preplanning, while the request wended through Navy and
Coast Guard channels.
AUVFEST had
two primary objectives:
Demonstrate
AUV systems emerging from the Organic Mine Countermeasures and
Autonomous Operations Future Naval Capabilities programs, in
support of mine countermeasures missions and Demonstrate
inter-operable communications of data and mission status among
various unmanned vehicle systems with a central command node.
AUVFEST
vehicles were of several sorts. They ranged from
bottom-crawlers to submersible vehicles to surface units
(kayaks), which were performing self-coordinated exercises near
the Naval Center docks with Navy Seals diving in support of the
tests. Some of the underwater vehicles were programmed to
surface if data contact was broken by a private boat passing
between two communicating units. This could result in damage to
the test vehicle, the transiting boat, or both. Of special
concern was the safety of the Navy Seals from boaters unaware of
their presence.
In all
there were four operating areas, spread along more than three
miles of Port Orchard inlet at the conjunction of the routes to
and from three major Puget Sound recreational boating
objectives: Poulsbo, Port Orchard/Bremerton, and the Seattle
area. In order to safeguard all parties, the Navy established a
Range Boundary significantly larger than the normal Restricted
Area in place at Keyport as shown on navigation charts.
Negotiations between Navy and Coast Guard resulted in approval
of one facility per day, and orders were finally received for a
start on 9 June. The large protection area, with three entrance
routes, coupled with the Navy restricting vessel traffic to the
shoreline, and to speeds no greater than five knots, appeared to
offer a real challenge for a single facility. It was.
Flotilla 45
had only two facilities available at the time, and one had
engine problems, so Facility 363098 (Lorelei), owner Phil
Ransford, got the nod. Lorelei is a 36’ Uniflite sedan with
twin 250 hp Cummins power; top speed about 20 knots. None of
the Flotilla 45 coxswains could commit to all operational days,
but the Flotilla did provide all the needed crew members. With
help of a coxswain from Flotilla 41, it was a continuously
varying crew that answered the call. The first two days were
patrolled by Coxswain Mike Dunn, with Phil Ransford and David
Erickson as crew. The third patrol saw Coxswain J.B. Hall, with
Phil Ransford and Roger Gray crewing; the fourth day was handled
by Coxswain Jon Sorenson, with Phil Ransford and Bob Erickson;
the fifth day consisted of Coxswain Clyde Snyder (130-04-01,
Port Townsend, WA), with Phil Ransford and Ray Bedford; and the
last day’s patrol was made by Coxswain J.B. Hall, with Phil
Ransford and David Erickson.
The
daily drill called for a 10-mile morning run from Lorelei’s
berth at her Port Orchard marina and check-in at Keyport, where
we picked up a range radio and any daily instructions from the
AUVFEST staff. Our normal station was nearly central, at the
confluence of the boating routes, where we could see approaching
traffic from all directions. On some days, sensitive operations
were underway in certain of the operating areas, and we were
asked to stay close by. AUVFEST range safety officers were
often able to point out targets, as they had a higher vantage
point and more powerful optics. After a couple of days, both
Navy and Auxiliary got into the swing, and things smoothed out
significantly. Range operations were usually completed by
1500-1630, at which point the radio was turned in and the
facility returned to base.
We found
the boating public generally cooperative but often uninformed.
Notices to Mariners had been published announcing the operations
in the Keyport restricted area, but even local marina management
seemed unaware. Because the single Facility had to cover
distances that were quite extensive, we tried to rely largely
on VHF contact. However, many boaters were found either to have
no VHF or not to be monitoring Channel 16.
If we could
not get the boat’s attention via radio, we had to “burn out the
carbon” and make a direct approach, hopefully before the boat
entered an operations area. After a few days of active
patrolling, we found that the word was getting around, and many
boats were observing the rules without being challenged.
There
are always a few who don’t want to cooperate, though, and
required an “up close and personal” approach to move them out of
danger. These problems averaged less than one a day, and we
often contacted twenty boats daily.
Events such
as this do wonders for improving the communication among boaters
and the Coast Guard, including the Auxiliary. They also point
out the opportunity for improvement, perhaps a new program of
broadly disseminating word of passage restrictions in the Coast
Guard’s regular radio broadcasts. Such broadcasts could help
educate the public about what our Armed Services and contractors
are doing to safeguard our nation, as well as enhancing boating
safety. Relying on the “Notice to Mariners” approach to reach
the boating public is insufficient, to say the least. We found
boaters to be more than willing to cooperate when sufficient
effort was made to get the word out. |